Welcome Citizen Member

We are giving you some information that Naturopathic Medical Doctors and Herbalists around the world use in the treatment of their clients.

           You will see that some of them desire to call themselves Medical Doctors by saying that they are Naturopathic Medical Doctors with a medical practice, just like the Osteopathic Doctors call themselves Osteopathic Medical Doctors.                

           This means that they are practicing Medicine in a Naturopathic manner or practicing Medicine in an Osteopathic Manner or “using natural procedures” with the Allopathic Medical Secular Scientific system rather than using their own, which they “do not” know!

           This forces everyone who doesn’t know of their science to use the Secular System, which is contrary to their use of Natural Processes and cause the many uncontrolled responses and confusion that are experienced, not only in Allopathic Medical processes but within the Alternative Natural Health Care System!

            There is a large general group of Naturopathic Physicians who do not claim to be Natural Doctors practicing Naturopathic Medicine or that they have a medical practice and though they call their herbals medicines instead of what they really are (foods). 

            The reason for this mistake is that they have not had an understanding of their own complete science and have borrowed many practices and words from Secular Science and the Allopathic System of application.

            Many of your natural practitioners, because they do not understand their own profession or its science, have done this and because of it, they have suffered a great deal of persecution from Allopathic Practitioners who do not accept or believe that natural procedures and substances (food) help correct a diseased condition as efficiently as their system.

            But, time has proven differently and many Allopathic Physicians have now begun to use some of these Alternative Natural methods and products, but only in the hopes of taking them away from the Natural Practitioner.

           The majority of the Natural Practitioners, in general, relate to their work as practicing Natural Medicine, which by them is looked at as different from Allopathic Medicine, which has different methods of administration and therapies.

           Most people do not realize that there are actually “two” different systems for the delivery of health care procedures and products and therefore have misunderstood what should really be done, within each system used to deliver their “methods and products.”

           Most of Naturopathic and other “Natural Methodologies” are rejected by the Allopathic system and the ignorant public as quackery, until recent years.

          In the last five years the Allopathic Practitioner has had to look for alternatives to their toxic drugs and surgical methods because the public is looking for alternatives, therefore many of their practitioners who have more intelligence, integrity and ethics like those few, who have fought for the last two-hundred years, with their colleagues, have started to use Alternative “Natural methods” by calling it INTEGRATIVE OR BLENDED MEDICINE.

          The Secular Allopathic Practitioner proclaims to do their own research as to the effectiveness of these natural methods and to know if it does or does not work!

          There also is a movement by many Naturopathic Physicians to work in cooperation with Allopathic Physicians with each contributing their expertise to those who come in to their office.

           Little do they realize the danger they have placed their profession, because the Secular Allopath is attempting to pirate these methods and establish them as their own so eventually they can pass laws to exclude any Natural Practitioner from using them, like they did to the Osteopath!

           The material below is common knowledge among the Naturalist and has been for two hundred years or more, with some of it being several thousand years old.

            The problem of ignorance still exists and is passed on to the ignorant and unsuspecting person who believe they have the truth, because they get better results, even though they experience the same type of failures as with drug therapy and surgery, they are fewer, thus keeping them in their belief that they have the whole truth!

 

The information, given below, has been used to help feed the bodies of the male who is suffering from malnutrition in such a manner that hopefully this plant provides what is needed by their body!

 

What the naturalist and the Allopathic Medical Doctor does not generally recognize is that this herb is a food, even if they want to call it a medicine, it will only help those who are compatible with it and to that degree it is compatible it will help a male’s system to regain chemical balance so it can function properly.

 

If it is not compatible or only to a degree, the help obtained will be from great damage to those who are totally not compatible to the varying degree to which they are compatible.

 

This is the way all substances function in our bodies because each person’s system will take each substance and use it (change it into what it needs) in the best way for its own needs and if it cannot change it into a compatible substance that substance becomes a toxin the body needs to get rid of.

 

When the body cannot get rid of it through its elimination system, it will find a dumping or storage area to put it and isolate it (encapsulating it) so it cannot poison any cells.

 

If a person’s body is too toxic, this process breaks down and severe disease, inflammations and many other conditions develop as toxic chemicals begin to crystallize in the tissues of joints and other areas where fluids are needed, causing inflammation and pain!

 

This is what happens within the tissues of the prostate, when certain chemicals are not present to prevent this from happening and when sufficient exercise is not engaged in to keep the fluids of the body moving that carry away these toxic chemicals.

 

Then, micro-organisms that are naturally within the tissues of all living things have sufficient food (destroyed and dying cell tissue, they like vultures will attempt to clean up this debris.  This is what researcher see when looking at the body and mistakenly declare them to be the cause of disease.

 

Although these organisms excrete toxic waste the bodies immune system usually will detoxify or use those chemicals for its best good, but when the body is over toxic the immune system breaks down and real cell breakdown begins and diseases of all types will manifest, including AIDS (an Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome).

 

Our universe does not agree with the methods of education by either system as they make their announcements as if they are the ultimate cure for all disease or for the one they are targeting.  Yes, they may help someone, but these product (foods) do not help everyone and will even hurt those who are not compatible to it chemical make up!

 

We again declare that it is at your own risk that you choose to use this or any other product advertised as a cure to a condition!  What the public does not know and the professional do not say, is that these substances will help certain people with different problems as well as the chemical make up of the product supplies what that person needs.

 

Therefore, it is seen over time and not from science that there are many different diseased problems that one product is capable of helping in the its correction with a person’s body!

 

This becomes confusing to not only the public but also the declared professional who is not sufficiently educated in this system or the full science and information needed to function properly is not available, so many errors are made and people are hurt or spend large sums of money and time trying to find what will work for them!

 

There are similar explanations given by many other people and researchers, because they have obtained many parts of the science, but none have the complete science and therefore they cannot explain everything in simple easy to understand and use scientific terms like we can in our universe!

 

This is why you have so much confusion!

 

Remember that the information given below is not going to help everyone although they make it sound like it, so you will buy it to blindly try something that has the capability of hurting you, if you do not know that it is compatible to your specific chemistry and body requirements!

      

        We want to help you solve this problem and free you from your fear, anxiety, and ignorance so you can have the tools to govern your own life and have a long, happy, healthy, disease and pain free life!

We start with this information from your Alternative Health Care System with:

Answers to Your Health Questions

“Saw Palmetto Extract: Nature’s Answer to Prostate Enlargement

The prostate is a single, doughnut-shaped gland about the size of a walnut that lies below the bladder and surrounds the urethra. The prostate secretes a thin, milky, alkaline fluid which lubricates the urethra to prevent infection and increases sperm motility. Prostate secretions are extremely important to successful fertilization for procreation. Benign (non-malignant) enlargement of the prostate gland is known medically as “benign prostatic hyperplasia” (BPH). Because an enlarged prostate can pinch off the flow of urine, BPH is characterized by symptoms of bladder obstruction such as increased urinary frequency, nighttime awakening to empty bladder, and reduced force and caliber of urination.

 

Q How common is BPH?

A. Very. Current estimates are that it affects over 50% of men in their lifetime. The actual frequency rate increases with advancing age from approxi­mately 5% to 10% at age 30 to over 90% in men over 85 years of age.1

 

Q How is BPH diagnosed?

A It is often recommended that men over the age of 40 have yearly prostate exams. This exam is not high tech. It simply involves a doctor inserting a gloved finger into the rectum and feeling the lower part of the prostate for any abnormality. However, in the case of BPH, often the prostate has not enlarged to a point recognized by physical exam. And, in the case of cancer, a digital exam is not reliable enough.

 

The classic enlarged prostate due to BPH will usually feel softer (boggy) and may be two to three times larger than normal. In BPH the prostate is non-tender, this differentiates it from prostatitis. The classic finding in prostatic cancer is that the prostate feels much harder and the border is not as well defined.

 

The definitive diagnosis for BPH can be made with the aid of ultrasound measurements. But, because the symptoms of BPH and prostate cancer can be quite similar, a simple blood test is used to differentiate BPH from the more serious prostate cancer. The blood test measures the levels of a protein that is produced in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The PSA test is regarded as a highly significant and ½ sensitive marker for prostate cancer. The normal value for PSA is less than four nanograms per milli­liter. An elevation above 10 is highly indicative of prostate cancer.

 

There has been concern that the use of PSA as a screening test for prostate cancer is not reliable enough. Although an elevated level indicates prostate cancer, mid-range elevations in PSA can be caused by BPH and in some instances, there may be prostate cancer yet PSA levels are not elevated. Despite the fact that this test is not perfect, it is a simple, relatively non-invasive test that can provide valuable information. PSA screening has been endorsed by the American Cancer Society, the American Urological Association, and other physicians’ groups.

 

If you are a man over the age of 50 and if any of your immediate relatives—father, brother, or uncle—has had prostate cancer, an annual prostate exam and PSA test is a very good idea.

 

WARNING: Prostate disorders can only be diagnosed by a physician. Do noi sell-diagnose. If you are experiencing any symptoms associated with BPH or prostate cancer. see your physician immediately for proper diagnosis.

 

Third Party Literature

 

The enclosed abstracts and/or third party articles were independently prepared and hove been reproduced in their entirety. They are not intended to promote a particular manufacturer or brand of dietary supplement. If used in connection with the sale of a dietary supplement to consumers, they must be presented with other such items on the same subject matter, so as to present a balanced view of the available information on a dietary supplement. These materials should not be modified or violated with any information by sticker or any other method. Enzymatic Therapy, Inc. is pleased to present these materials as part of its continuing education program.           

 

Study 5

Authors:                                Mattei, et al.

Type of study:                     DB vs. placebo

Number of patients:             40

Length of study                 3 months

Results:                                 Significant difference for: dysuria,

                                              nocturia, residual urine

 

Study 6

                                              Braekman, et al. Open

                                              305

                                              3 months

                                              Significant difference for: maximum

                                              urine flow, prostate volume, and international prostate score

 

Although the saw palmetto extract has shown excellent results in numerous clinical trials, results from a recent study are perhaps the most revealing.18 In this study, 305 men were given 160 mg of the saw palmetto extract standardized to contain 85% to 95% fatty acids and sterols twice daily. After 45 days, 83% of patients estimated the drug was effective.

 

After 90 days, the percentage increased to 88%. Similarly, global evalu­ations made by physicians after 45 and 90 days demonstrated 81% and 88% effectiveness, respectively.

 

The objective evaluations demonstrated remarkable improvements in all measurements. Maximum urinary flow (ml/s) increased from 9.8 to 12.2, mean urinary flow rate (ml/s) increased from 5.8 to 7.4, prostate volume (mm3) decreased from 40,348 to 36,246; and the international prostate symptom score decreased from 19.0 to 12.4. No serious adverse reactions were reported.

 

While these results are impressive, perhaps the most impressive changes occurred in the quality of life scores as shown in Table 2.

 

Table 2. Quality of life scores

 

Evaluation                                Day 0                          Day 90
Delighted                                            0.6%                        5.4%
Happy                                               
2.3%                      24.0%
Satisfied                                              9.7%                      36.8%
Mitigated                                         
22.7%                      20.9%
Unsatisfied                                       43.8%                        9.5%
Unhappy                                          18.5%                        2.4%
Hopeless                                            2.3%                        1.0%

 

These improvements demonstrate just how powerful of an effect that improving bothersome symptoms such as nocturia can have on an individuals mental outlook. Many men suffering from an enlarged prostate suffer from sleep deprivation. Improving sleep by reducing the number of times for nighttime urination is thought to be the major reason for the improvement in quality of life scores with saw palmetto extract. Another important finding from this study was that the saw palmetto extract had no demonstrable effect on serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) levels.

 

OUR COMMENTS:

 

We do not what to disillusion anyone about using this product because it is only one substance that is the answer for only some people, even though it helps the larger number.  Also this type testing method does not really prove that the product will work for anyone other than those tested and because of the varying degree to which it worked each individual, each person had their own degree of success!

 

The form of science (the Empirical research method) used is pseudo-science and is insufficient in doing this type of research.  It works with the physical sciences where testing the composition of rocks and the like or other physical no life forms are being tested, but to use it on biologically studies is asking for false information.   It gives only part of the answer and does not prove its usability across the board in the manner they want you to believe.

 

This is why they must always say, lets try this and see if it will work, because so and so used it and had great results!  This is not science but the ARTFULL administration of dangerous modalities!  This does not mean that it or any other procedure will work for you.  If it does, then why are there so many failures to varying degrees and far to many total failures after all is said and done?

 

Why do they all not experience the same degree of success?  Why did not all of them have good results and why were there those who did not get any help from it? 

 

Even though there did not seem to be any bad side effects for the length of time that is was used, if those who used it continue to do so, they will begin to experience other conditions that they will not attribute to the use of this herb.

 

If they continue it use they will experience new conditions that will be directly connected to its continued use and specifically after it no longer was needed (on the false pretense of prevention).  It will become toxic!  This and many other things are scientifically provable facts, with our science.

 

They cannot give you scientific answers to these questions. 

 

We can answer all of these questions and more, because our science gives us the answers!

 

Q How soon should I expect to see results with saw palmetto extract?

While the drug finesteride (Proscar) typically takes up to a year to produce significant benefit, saw palmetto extract pro­duces better results in a much shorter period of time. Most patients achieve some relief of symptoms within the first 30 days of treatment.

 

Table 3. Saw Palmetto Extract vs. Finesteride on Urine Flow Rate (mllsec): Pooled Data from

 

Double-blind Studies

                                Saw Palmetto Extract             Finesteride

Initial measurement            9.53                                  9.6
3 months                              13.15*                               10.4
12 months                         **                                                            11.2
% increase                            38.0%                                16.0%
                                           in 3 months                       in 12 months

 

~Many studies on the saw palmetto extract were shorter than 90 days: final measurements were calculated as 90-day measurements.

**There are few long-term studies on saw palmetto extract, yet the effect at three months (or less) are obviously superior to Proscar.

 

Q What about other herbal medicines for an enlarged prostate such as pygeum, pumpkin seed oil, and stinging nettle?

 

14 Based on careful examination of the published literature, I would rate the relative effectiveness of these agents as follows:

saw palmetto > pygeum > urtica> pumpkin seed oil. However, in certain situations one herbal approach may be more effective than another. Even though I rate pygeum lower than saw pal­metto, in some cases it may produce better results than saw palmetto. Each plant has a slightly different mechanism of action and can certainly be used in combination safely.

 

To achieve the benefit with saw palmetto, it is essential that the fat-soluble saw palmetto extracts are standardized to contain 85% to 95% fatty acids and sterols. These extracts are available in capsule form; take 160 mg twice daily. A similar dose of active compounds using crude berries, fluid extracts, and tinctures cannot be easily achieved. Again, if you want the best results, make sure you are using the right extract at the right dosage.

 

Saw palmetto extract is completely safe as no significant side effects have ever been reported in the clinical trials of the extract or with saw palmetto berry ingestion.

 

Q What causes BPH?

 

A.         BPH is largely the result of hormonal changes associated with aging. It is clearly dependent upon the actions of male hormones (androgens) within the prostate. These changes within the prostate reflect the many significant changes in both male (androgen), female (estrogen), and pituitary hormone levels in aging men. The main male sex hormone testosterone (T) decreases with advancing age, but estrogen, prolactin, LH, and FSH levels are all increased.

 

The ultimate effect of these changes is that within the prostate gland there is an increased concentration of testosterone and an increased conversion of this testosterone to an even more potent form known as dihydrotestosterone (DHT). The increase in testosterone and DHT is largely due to a decreased rate of removal combined with an increase in the activity of the enzyme 5-alpha-reductase, the enzyme that converts testosterone to DHT.2 Elevated estrogen levels are thought to be the key factor that inhibits the elimination of DHT from the prostate in BPH.

 

Q is having an enlarged prostate dangerous?

 

A If left untreated, BPH will eventually obstruct the bladder outlet resulting in the retention of urine and eventually kidney damage. As this situation is potentially life-threatening, proper treatment is crucial. In the past, medical treatment involved a procedure known as a TURP (trans-urethral resection of the prostate).

 

Because this surgery is associated with a high rate of morbidity and will often make matters worse, it should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.

 

There are about 30 different plant-based compounds currently available in Europe for the treatment of BPH. But, the most popular (and seemingly most effective) is the extract of saw palmetto berry.

 

Q What is saw palmetto berry extract?

 

A Saw palmetto extract is an extract made from the fruit of a palm tree (Serenoa repens) native to Florida that has been shown to significantly improve the signs and symptoms of BPH in numerous clinical studies (see Table 1). The mechanism of action is related to improving the hormonal metabolism within the prostate gland. As a result of its multitude of effects, excellent results have been produced in numerous clinical studies. Roughly 90% of men with mild to moderate BPH experience some improvement in symptoms during the first four to six weeks of therapy. All major symptoms of BPH are improved, especially nocturia (urinating at night).619

 

 

Table 1. Clinical studies demonstrating efficacy of

 

Serenoa repens extract (85-95% fatty acids and sterols at a dosage of 320 mg daily)

 

Study 1

 

Authors:                                                      Cirillo, et al.

Type of study:                                            Open

Number of patients:                                    47

Length of study:                                         4 months

Results:                                                       Significant difference for: nocturia, urine flow dysuria.

 

Q Are herbal medicines effective in the treatment of BPH?

 

A Yes. But, the chance of clinical success with any of the botanical treatments for BPH appears to be determined by the degree of obstruction as indicated by the residual urine content (the amount of urine left in the bladder after urination as deter­mined by ultrasound). For levels less than 50 ml, the results are usually excellent. For levels between 50 and 100 ml, the results are usually quite good. Residual urine levels between 100 ml and 150 ml will be tougher to produce significant improvements in the customary four- to six-week period. If the residual urine content is greater than 150 ml, saw palmetto extract and other botanical medicines are not likely to produce any significant improvement

 

Q Is BPH common in other parts of the world?

 

A Yes. Interestingly, however, is the fact that plant-based med­icines are much more popular prescriptions in Europe than their synthetic counterparts, according to an article published in the British Journal of Urology. Specifically in Germany and Austria botanical medicines are considered “first-line” treatments for BPH and account for greater than 90% of all drugs in the medical management of BPH. In Italy, plant extracts are prescribed 10 times more frequently than drugs like Proscar and Hytrin.3~

 

Study 2

 Authors:                                                       Greca, et al.

 Type of study:                                             Open

 Number of patients:                                     14

 Length of study:                                           1-2 months

Results:                                                          Significant difference for: dysuria, perineal heaviness, nocturia, volume of urine per voiding, interval    between                       -                                                                      two diurnal voidings, sensation of incomplete voiding

 

Study 3

                                                                       Cukier, et al.

                                                                       (double blind)-DB vs. placebo

                                                                       168

                                                                       60-90 days

                                                                       Significant difference for: dysuria,

                                                                       frequency, residual urine

 

Study 4

                                                                       Champault, et al.

                                                                       DB vs placebo

                                                                       168

                                                                       60-90 days

                                                                       Significant difference for: objective

                                                                       and subjective parameters

 

References

1.  Oesterling JE: “Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review of its histogenesis and natural history.” Prostate 6(Suppl.):67-73, 1996

 

2.  Horton R: ‘Benign prostatic hyperplasia: A disorder of androgen metabo­lism in the male.”jAm Geri Soc 32:380-5, 1984

 

3.  Buck AC: “Phytotherapy for the prostate.” Br J Urol 78:325-36, 1996

 

4.  Lowe FC and Ku JC: “Phytotherapy in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A critical review.” Urology 48:12-20, 1996

 

5.  Bach D. Schmitt M, and Ebeling L: “Phytopharmaceutical and synthetic agents in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.” Phytomed

3:309-13, 1996

 

6.  Boccafoschi and Annoscia 5: “Comparison of Serenoa repens extract with placebo hy controlled clinical trial in patients with prostatic adenomatosis.” Urologia 50:1257-68, 1983

 

7.  Cirillo-Marucco E, Pagliarulo A. Tritto G, et al.: “Extract of Serenoa repens (Permixon~) in the early treatment of prostatic hypertrophy.” Urologia 5:1269-77, 1983

 

8.  Tripodi V. Giancaspro M, Pascarella M, et al.: “Treatment of prostatic hypenrophy with Serenoa repens extract.” Med Praxis 4:41-6, 1983

 

9.  Emili F, La Cigna M and Petrone U: “Clinical trial of a new drug for treating hypertrophy of the prostate (Permixon).” Uro/ogia 50:1042-8, 1983

 

10.            Greca P and Volpi R: “Experience with a new drug in the medical treat­ment of prostatic adenoma.” Urologia 52:532-5, 1985

II. Duvia R. Radice GP, and Galdini R: “Advances in the phytotherapy of prostatic hypertrophy.” Med Praxis 4:143-8. 1983

 

12.            Tasca A, Barulli M, Cavazzana A, et al.: “Treatment of obstructive symp­tomatology caused by prostatic adenoma with an extract of Serenoa repens. Double-blind clinical study vs. placebo.” Minerva Urol Neji~ol 37:87-91, 1985

 

13.            Cukier (Paris), Ducassou (Marseille), Le Guillou (Bordeaux), et al.:

“Permixon versus placebo.” CR Ther Pharmacol C/in 4/25:15-21, 1985

 

14.            Champlault G, Patel JC. and Bonnard AM: “A double-blind trial of an extract of the plant Serenoa repens in benign prostatic hyperplasia.” Br J C/in Pharmaco/ 18:46 1-2, 1984

 

15.            Crimi A and Russo A: “Extract of Serenoa repens for the treatment of the functional disturbances of prostate hypertrophy.’ Med Praxiss 4:47-51, 1983

 

16.            Champault G, Bonnard AM, Cauquil J, and Patel JC: “Medical treatment of prostatic adenoma.” Controlled trial: PA 109 vs placebo in 110 patients. Ann U,o/ 18:407-10, 1984

 

17.            Mattei FM, Capone M, and Acconcia A.: “Serenoa repens extract in the medical treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy.” Urologia 55:547-

52, 1988

 

18.            Braeckman J: “The extract of Serenoa repens in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A multicenter open study.” Curr Ther Res

55:776-85, 1994

 

19.            Bach D and Ebeling L: “Long-term drug treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia-results of a prospective 3-year multicenter study using Sabal extract 1DS89.” Phytomed 3:105-Il, 1996.

 

        OUR COMMENTS:

There are many more studies that could be given.  We believe that better results will be obtained if all of those who have successfully and unsuccessfully used these products were gathered. This information could be put into one study and it would provide the best and most accurate results of their use.  But this is not practical, as good an idea as it may be, information of the past two hundred years of their use is not available, except in books of recorded use that say it worked well or in varying degrees.

 

Because double blind Empirical Pseudo-science is not very effective, in the manner it is being used, individual studies are more effective.

 

Now if you look at these Empirically done studies as a study of individuals who use the same or different substances, than you will know that the products works with that problem for that person and not for others, which proves the science that dictates these types of outcomes!

 

Good luck in your quest for more information and a better understanding of your condition!  CONTACT US if you have personal questions or for a personal one on one consultation at our facility on your planet!