DIET FOR DIABETICS

Presented by

“The Science of Wellness”

Society

Traditionally, from Conventional Allopathic Medical Practitioners and Nutritionist first declared that diet had little to do with disease and that micro-organisms were their cause. Natural Alternative Medical Practitioners-Naturopaths, Chiropractors, Herbalist, Oriental and East Indian and other Eastern Practitioners have been suggesting that diet and life styles are a major cause of disease with stress and environmental toxins following close behind.

They have suggested that our diets for diabetes should be high in complex carbohydrates, vegetables and whole grains (high fiber), and low in fats and proteins. Additionally, the diabetic should focus on whole, unprocessed foods and avoid alcohol, caffeine and sugar.

In trying to understand how the body functions, they, for-the-most-part have not established any form of science to guide them in this task, but have established a set of partially developed scientific approaches. These systems are followed in their research projects and in the development of their therapies, but they have failed to establish a complete scientific system to assist them in the manner in which they approach each individual and apply their therapeutic methods!

Because of this lack of a complete science, they have been declared an ART rather than a SCIENCE.

Therefore, their decisions have been guided, mostly by observation and experience. Because of this accepted half scientific system, most practitioners are not aware that they are not using a complete science when determining what to do with whom they call a patient.

What they have traditionally accepted and called their scientific procedure is to gather information from a variety of sources as to what a practitioner discovered helped people to overcome their diseased condition! They then have used these procedures to treat those who come to them.

Such processes have made up the majority of their education and practices. A partial scientific system of testing substances upon people was developed, without knowing the true affects of a substance or procedure. Problems developed so animals have been used to find out what toxic affects a substance might have on them and from the outcome they determine if it is safe for human consumption.

This defies all laws of physics and other principles of true science and omits many concepts that are essential for correct application of any product or therapy. Without this complete science there have developed a variety of systems to help measure the affect of a therapy or product in an attempt to be more individually specific. But these systems although very helpful also fall far short in their overall effectiveness, for far to many people are NOT HELPED OR ARE HARMED while others just fall to the wayside.

Traditionally certain methods of treatment filter down to be the most used, because they provide the most success and create the means to entice people to submit to a practitioner’s judgement as to how and when a substance or therapeutic method would be used. Experience, intellect and skill have become the mainstay part of their approach to treating disease!

Both Conventional and Alternative Medical practitioners have followed this incomplete scientific method for treatment and research, fighting among themselves as to who has the most success and follows scientific procedures!

The truth about all of this is that NEITHER ONE ARE USING A FULL COMPLETE SCIENCE. Therefore, you see all the problems and sporadic outcomes, successful results with some, less successful with others until many are harmed and some even die as their experience from accepting the opinions of those who are calling themselves EXPERTS IN HEALTH CARE!

After the public’s experience, they have become very confused and now skeptical about whether or not they can trust anyone who calls themselves a Professional, because they have gone to school, taken tests and have obtained licenses to do what they were trained to do.

But this has not been any more successful in protecting the public than anything else, because no one seems to know or at least understand what the real problems are with ALL OF THE WORLDS HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS!

Over the years a traditional procedure has been accepted as has many other procedures they have been using, but now these all have been challenged as to their effectiveness, because statistics that have been gathered NOW SHOW THAT EVERYTHING HAVE CAUSED BAD SIDE AFFECTS AND EVEN DEATHS, so WHAT DO WE REALLY TRUST AS THE TRUTH?

In the case of THE CONDITION CALLED DIABETES, the traditional approach declares that someone with this condition should use mostly A high fiber diet to conducive to control blood sugar levels! They declare that it reduces blood fats and the need for insulin and helps to slow the rate of food as it passes through the intestines into the bloodstream. High fiber foods include, almonds, prunes, figs, raisins, plums, blackberries, apples, peas, corn, zucchini, broccoli, kidney beans, potatoes, sweet potatoes, spinach, oat bran and whole wheat bread. (increased fluid intake can assist in dealing with the increased gas that can accompany the switch to a high fiber diet.)

But now after years of using the following program, the outcome is all confused, because people are still suffering from diabetes and in fact, it is on the increase, specifically among children. SO, WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON HERE?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE!

IS THIS PROGRAM GOOD OR BAD? WHICH IS IT!

This system is declared to be the best what to deal with a diabetic condition. Is this really the case, after all the facts are in?

Their observations declared it to be the best method because how it has helped some people. Due to being rich in soluble fiber, it has

been suggested that ½-1 cup of beans daily could eliminate insulin dependence in type II diabetics by lowering blood

cholesterol and blood sugar.

Contrasting, low fiber foods are quickly absorbed into the blood and cause spikes in blood sugar levels. Furthermore, high fiber diets have been known to effect an increase in the number of insulin receptor sites, stimulate the cells enzyme machinery for burning glucose and increase cell sensitivity to insulin. This reduces the need to take insulin, etc. so they believe it is the best treatment!

Their half scientific studies and statistical data of the outcomes of what they use, indicate chromium rich foods such as whole grain breads and cereals, brewers yeast, wheat germ and orange juice as beneficial. Also vitamin C, B6, copper, selenium and zinc are among those known to assist in treating, controlling and even reversing diabetes. Additionally, in Arabia and Japan Studies have shown that Aloe Vera juice functions to lower blood sugar in patients with diabetes.

Additionally, calcium, magnesium, selenium, molybdenum, chromium, iron, copper, zinc, and even boron are typically deficient in the modern diet. This situation, combined with the nutrient loss associated with excessive urine excretion caused by diabetes, makes it easy to become deficient in the nutrients necessary for cell function, structure, and communication.

COMMENTS:

The Science of Wellness Society and its professionals find, what is given above, though good information, under certain specific conditions of each person, such information has been gathered over the years from experience and statistical research that has not been conducted using a complete science. Therefore, it is inaccurate as far as the advice given in relationship to, who, when, how and other variables that need to be addressed before applying or using what has affected the blood sugar of many individuals.

We have discovered, using a complete science, that it is not wise to take what has worked for one person and assume that everyone will respond the same, nor that what is working for one person will continue to work. We know this because The Science of Wellness gives us the laws and principles that govern all physical and chemical interactions within all biological organisms.

Because there are laws of physics that govern all chemical interactions within biological organisms, we can understand and validate the statements of Hippocrates, Paracelsus and others that, “one man’s food is another man’s poison,” “One man’s poison is another man’s food,” “Let your food be your medicine and your medicine be your food.” AND NOW we can ADD A NEW ONE TO THIS LIST, “one man’s food becomes his own poison!”

Therefore, to assume that a food or substance that corrects or affects one person in a positive and constructive manner will always respond the same, within this person or in all other persons, is ludicrous and specifically unscientific.

Thus, it is not a scientific truth to declare the suggestions given above in the treatment of Diabetic conditions are the processes to follow in all situations and in all cases diagnosed as DIABETIC. In fact it is very unwise to assume that all persons diagnosed with this condition should follow the traditional suggestions above.

It is wise and scientific to first determine that the substances used are as chemically compatible as possible and thus useable by the person that has been given the suggestion to use them. When following the full Science of Wellness a person may therefore be successful in helping to correct this condition. Only substances that are compatible, with the person diagnosed with this condition, should be used.

The Science of Wellness has the answers!

In fact it is unwise to create a research project that does not take into consideration the individual differences and compatibility of a product with anyone participating in this project. It makes no sense to give a substance to a person that has no chemical compatibility with the test substance, because of the reality that such a substance if not compatible will create a different response than when given to a person who has compatibility.

It is also ludicrous to ignore the reality that a substance that is more compatible with one person than another, will give a greater positive outcome than that which will be displayed by someone that is less compatible with that substance and a greater probability that a person that is totally incompatible with such a substance will have an extremely high probability of having a negative response to that substance!

To use a substance on a wide range of persons with divergent compatibility to a substance will create a condition that yields a greater chaotic outcome and less significant results, which in reality is the result of an improper sample of subjects. Thus, the outcome of such research will change, when given to a larger sample and yield an even more diverse response due to the divergent nature of the sample population used.

It becomes imperative that the sample of the population that is used in testing a product must be determined to be either highly compatible or that each sample is uniformly determined to have the same type of compatibility from highly to none, so that each group can be observed as they respond more uniformly to the substance given. Without determining the compatibility of a substance to a person taking it the possibility of controlling or accurately predicting the outcome, will be greatly affected, which pollutes the sample and nullifies the project!

What one study finds out will be different from that of another study simply because different people are being used that have different compatibility with the substance and thus the outcome will always be different. A product that is tested to have no significant negative side effects with one group may and usually will have significant negative side effect with a larger sample, simply due to the principle of individual differences and the compatibility or non-compatibility of one person from another!

So we declare to all who read the above information that you will be using these suggestion at your own risk and that if you have any positive results it will be strictly based upon luck and nothing scientific!

But if you have the complete Science of Wellness you will have the necessary information to determine the outcome at a much greater probability of it being positive than without this science. So, good luck if you chose to follow any suggestions given in any book that does not also give you a complete science to guide you in your applying their suggestions or health program.

Our Professionals just need to become aware of this science and make some small changes in their belief systems and procedures in order to correct the confusion that some things are GOOD AND OTHERS ARE BAD, WHEN SUCH IS JUST NOT THE CASE! Scientifically, there are no GOOD OR BAD THINGS!

Under PRESENT PROFESSIONAL PROCEDURES and conditions there will be no real way that they can give you any real scientific reason that you should use their programs or product the way they suggest, because everyone is different and will respond differently to each program or product!

To use any program or product without knowing how compatible you are with it is to engage in a very risky activity. So we wish you the best of luck, or you can take our seminars and obtain a more realistic procedure that will guide you through your selections of what you use or do!

The proof is in the confusion that exists today and the inability of the professional to scientifically explain in simple terms, why they suggest what they do! High fiber diets help, but whole grains are devastating many who are not compatible with such diets, so it is now obviously evident that each person must receive their own specific diet, which scientifically will not stay compatible. Therefore other foods must be found that they can change to in order to be symptom free.

In actuality this process is necessary for everyone to become aware of and learn how to regulate their own diets, from month to month and year to year, before any control of the presently experienced diseases will be obtained!

There are some very good foods, programs, diets, supplements and food products that are helpful to many people, but they do not nor will they ever help everyone, nor will they help any person for ever! It is essential of obtain the Science of Wellness to really know what to do in all situations. Without it, you will always be having to guess at some point in what you do!

Vaccinations, drugs, nutrition, supplements, diets, therapies are not the complete answer, because what helps one person will harm others and what harms others will help yet different people!

DO YOU KNOW HOW TO TELL WHEN THIS IS SO?

Example support:

AGING RESEARCH

“There exists an Egyptian papyrus, written 2,600 years ago, called “Book for Transforming an Old Man into a Youth of Twenty.” Likewise, Taoist sages prescribed diet regimens, her potions and special exercises in the hope of preserving vigor and attaining physical immortality. Stories of magical elixirs and immortality-giving, youth-preserving “food of the gods” are a common theme in mythology and literature, showing humanity’s longing to conquer aging. Amazingly, for millennia humans believed that the right special food could preserve eternal youth; that there existed something the gods ate or drank that prevented aging.

This aging-retarding food of the gods is right in our kitchen, Spears announces. But the secret is not so much in what we eat, as what we do not eat. If we eat less, we will live longer....”The fewer calories you consume, the less energy is required to process the incoming food and the fewer free radicals you make. The fewer free radicals you make, the longer you live.”

Calorie restriction: the “Holy Grail” of anti-aging...we must eat less. “There is only one consensus in the world of anti-aging: the only proven way to reverse aging is to restrict calories.” Yes, we readily agree that many people, perhaps most, in effect kill themselves by eating too much. There are no obese centenarians. ...he asserts that it is indeed possible to feel perfectly sated and have a lot of energy if one eats the correct carbohydrate-restricted diet that includes sufficient protein and fat—the two macronutrients that will stabilize blood sugar in the longevity-promoting low-normal range and provide sustained energy.

...one can go down to 1200 calories for the average woman and 1500 calories for the average man. ...90% of free radicals (toxins) in our bodies are generated through the utilization of food. In spite of the outcry about pollution and radiation, these are relatively marginal sources of free radicals. The sad truth is that the more calories we eat, the more free radicals we generate, and if most of these calories come from high-glycemic carbohydrates (bread, cereal, pasta, pastry, most fruit juice, overcooked vegetables, etc), then we also begin to suffer from hyperinsulinemia and hypercortisolism, with a corresponding drop in beneficial hormones such as DHEA and growth hormone. The result of both excess calories and the endocrine imbalance that follows is the creeping middle-age spread (as the saying goes, “middle-age starts when you start growing in the middle”), and no end of degenerative disorders.

According to Spears, the crucial concept is the inversion of the USDA food pyramid, with its bizarre, pro-aging recommendation of up to eleven daily servings of starchy food (cereal, bread, pasta and other refined carbohydrates)are placed at the very top of Spears’ anti-aging pyramid, with the admonition “Use sparingly” while the Federal United States government urges us to eat them freely. Spears says that these should be severely reduced, even eliminated. Instead of being the main staple, they should hardly be consumed at all. (We suggest that they should be used mostly as sprouts and in drinks of various kinds, without chemical preservatives.)

...the so-called whole-wheat bread, is very efficient at raising our blood sugar and insulin. If you ever see the insulin curve after a “meal containing bread,” you would be quite motivated to eliminate all forms of bread except perhaps a bit of coarse rye. ...What would we eat without bread and other cereals? Lots of vegetables, as long as they are not overcooked, and moderate servings of low-glycemic fruits. ...And if we eat the plant food raw, we are also getting the benefits of natural, live, enzyme-rich food. ...Spears recommends daily moderate exercise as an essential part of his anti-aging program. ...”The more intense the exercise, the fewer the benefits for longevity.” ...intense exercise also increases the levels of free radicals.”

COMMENT by the Science of Wellness Society:

This still does not express the use of a scientific in applying what people suggest you use!

Although this is what is called scientific research that supports the Science of Wellness it does not supply the science by which all of their findings can be proven as factual when people do what they suggest!

Our latest National News report on Dec. 31, 2002 declared the inappropriate and misleading conclusions being made by bad research methods used by Conventional Medicine and Drug manufacturers, causing all the confusion, deadly outcomes and false reports of their safety, etc!

Some people have scientifically developed instruments to treat and text you in their attempt to determine what you should take or therapy you should receive, but they do not have the science that explains why, nor are they completely sure that what they have you take or do will really work for you! Experience and skill still reigns supreme and having a complete science to work with is not in their hands as yet!

Some use the scientific System of Kinesiology, which is probably the most accurate when used properly, but those who use this very good system, still do not have the science to explain why it works the way it does, except everyone is chemically different! They do not know how to scientifically explain or control the outcome!

Thank you,

The Science of Wellness Society

Copy by permission only or for educational purposes!

ALL INFORMATION IS UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW

AND ANY TYPE OF REPRODUCTION WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION

OF THE SCIENCE OF WELLNESS SOCIETY IS OPEN FOR PROSECUTION AT THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW.

TO FIND OUT MORE AND WHERE OR HOW TO REGISTER FOR ONE OF OUR SEMINARS:

The Science of Wellness Society

734 E. Broadway Rd. Ste. E

Mesa, Arizona 85204

480-827-9096 - or 1(800) 429-9367 for a Z-LINE ORDER - our Z-LINE NUMBER

you will enter on request will be (480) 827-9096 - leave a 30 sec Message free.

Leave a short message and be prepared with your information – make an order –

leave your name, an address, Phone#, working e-mail address, orders will be sent C.O.D.

FAX (810) 279-1643 ORDER OUR BOOKS LIST

Website: http://www.scienceofwellness.org

e-mail: office@scienceofwellness.org